Who and where are they getting
their orders from if it is not the voice in their head? Did hell freeze over in 2014? Who exactly is demanding a religious war and
is stalking us so that they can create the chaos and total insanity needed for
a religious rebirth or religious war?
Who got us into this predicament with their church and is using their
international churches for the drug wars and terrorism? Why won’t they end this and continue to
demand a religious war because they do not know what is real or not? Why is the relationship or any kind of
communication with them so unhealthy or such an excruciating experience? They were told and ordered to cease and
desist, to shut down for face some form of legitimate retaliation. They were told to stop stalking us and stop
communicating illegally; yet they have a grip on our reality and life. The voice inside their head tells them
something deliberate meanwhile the voice outside their head and everywhere tell
them what to do; yet they feel we need to be told what to do and leave. That is how powerful “our” voice and
reputation is, also “our” credibility.
We only want to keep the peace and make sure nobody got hurt.
The problem is how dangerous they are if they refuse to reform and choose death. Does this mean they cannot fly a plane, drive a bus, or do things that involve life and death? How about service and duty, does it mean we will be told what to do by a psychopath and traitor? How about piss tests, does it mean the help they offer is intended to help or cripple both reality? Is lying about it or slipping under the radar real or not? Will they tell us what to do or disrupt the thinking world and the world of technology?
Why does it feel like we are dealing with the dead or a zombie? Why does it feel like we are fighting a psychopathic dumbass or nutcase? Why does it feel like we are up against a factory of natural born terrorists, deadly stupidity, and a stubborn ignoramus who just refuses to leave us alone or be reformed? Why does it feel the only answer is to kill them when they goal is need based, to make us poor or one of them and then to tell us what to do and taunt us around the clock about how we think we know everything or refuse to leave? Why does it feel we have Al Qaeda or the Unabomber in our radar and in our life, trying to lead us down the road of death or some trap where they jump out everywhere and scream “over their dead body?” Does their entire church and religious experience survive on these need based disruptions and extreme violations of the law or just pure naked bigotry? Is their goal to overwhelm our world and existence with so much stress, pressure, and attacks by their defective products; our life is squashed, damaged, injured, or humiliated? Is this their church existence and religious experience or just something they do not know is real or not? They hide it well and we have trapped them in their own web of lies about how they feel and what they intend on doing about it. They wander around not even knowing what is real or what is wrong so the only option is to become a dictator and taunt our life with constant orders or what type of leader they need to fulfill their religious experience. War and terrorist disruptions is a process of telling us what to do. To exist and have this religious fulfillment, they must invent a poor kingdom or ensure technology can keep up with the poor, is it real?
We got in this mess because the people who only want to help or claim they only want to help their people, have a mind that severely lacks the vital ingredients to perfect their reality or be telling others what to do and how to do it. All of them feel they are born kings or managers. However, we find out their quest to help their people or help others is nothing more than a journey into their madness and chaotic life full of contradictions and lack of education. Regardless, they prefer telling others what to do rather than doing what is right or what they are told to do in order to improve their product and our quality of life. We got in this mess because their church is stuck in madness and cannot tell what is real or not, hence, they do not even know if they are real or not and whether other people are real or not. All they wish or care to do is live in this state of conditions and tell people what to do while they take us into total insanity and pull us down with them. It is a condition of inferiority and a detached reality identical to the Unabomber as he becomes more desperate to express a feeble upbringing or conditioning fit for the world of poverty. It is a power struggle between the classes. Clearly their church and their leaders feel a sense to help their own people but they find out the harsh reality, they can only hurt them in their selfish pursuits. We see this type of heroism in martial pursuits or in a mechanized endeavor; however, in the modern world of technology it is considered a primitive existence and a primitive church. This is also why it does not sell abroad and to a specific audience only.
What does the thinking world or
the world of science think about this church and their effort to take over the
world utilizing politics and dirty pure evil tricks? It is really annoying and their labors are
really crippling. However, regardless of
the big gigantic gap in the two worlds, they only want to tell people what to
do; otherwise, they must face the inevitable.
Hence they sneak around in our life and wander the world thinking they
are either the kings or the managers of other worlds they do not understand or
have any business being in. Furthermore,
they don’t shut up. The madness of
contradictions and the insanity of a world that cannot tell what are real or not;
are before us on their knees and dressed in their best uniform. Their image and appearance is not a match to
their thinking capacity or management skill; however, in some areas of business
and manual labor; it has its place and time.
Are their church leaders wise enough to tell them what is real or not;
or merely to hassle and prod us into teaching them the science to the modern
world our expertise? This mannerism will
lead to war and total chaos, a period of internecine war we typically see in
organized crime and drugs. Yet they
prevail and exist in the freest society and the most powerful. They rather choose death than to be reformed
and perfected; a form of learning disability and narcissism; a robotic state of
seeing and following without any real measurement or calculation. This is not what we want on the right wing
and it permeates in the left. It is not
what we want the police or military to look like but it invades our homes,
work, and entire reality because they too seek blood and treasures. That is our Unabomber.
Clearly their product is
defective and their hiring policies are a journey into madness or
disintegration. This is how we got into
this predicament or how organized they are in taking over our world. It is hard to fight authority or the police
when they are of this dead space. It is
extremely difficult to fight a government, backed by tax dollars or with
unlimited resources when this church and their business practices increase
production of their defective product.
It is difficult to bring them to justice or bring them to their knees
when they refuse to release their grip on our life or continue to tell us what
to do until pure madness or hospitalization is required. Clearly their journey into technology is not
warranted or valuable and hence the robotic mechanical approach to replace or
kick out their labors continuous.
Regardless, they fill our world with defective products and choose death
instead of being reformed. That explains
how hardcore of an organized criminal they truly are and what we can expect
from them or their demands. They don’t
know what is real but they feel they are leaders and managers. Furthermore, they feel power is not
accountable or resides under the laws we must live under also. This makes combating them twice as difficult. In tremendous debt and failure, they seek to
increase their production and expand and they manipulate a taxing need based
system to terrorize us.
Why must Asians embrace them or
their religious experience? Maybe that
is the whole scam, to wreck their future and drive them into ruin so they can
pretend they are powerful or the same? Is
it compatible to their church? Is it
compatible to their race? Is it
compatible to their American experience?
Is it compatible to our agreement or group thinking? Why is the truth illegal and why are endless
lies legal and allowed to exist? Because
they are selfish and want to win at any cost or because they refuse to reform
and want to wreck anything we have or any progress? Why is the truth, in their eyes illegal and
hurtful? They do not need to write it
down or explain, it already has been and this is the end of their journey. What is the impact of technology on their
primitive existence and false reality, a false consciousness? The manifesto is at the very end.
See saw how they refused to be
reformed and how their church chose death in South America . Must we see this in technology rich and
military powerful Asia ? Do we need to see this in America too from their church
leaders? Asia
is one of the largest technology sectors in the world and has gained the most
by technological schooling. Do they plan
on Unabombing it or war with the Asian continent over how confused they feel? The truth hurts but it is not a crime, why is
it now? I think we know why their
investments and interests are in Asia and must
be shut down; meanwhile their entire religious infiltration of the right
wing. If they feel we need to agree or
this is how they are, Africa is brimming with
their wish to help or become their puppet. I do not think they have a future in America or Asia ,
not anymore but they remain focused and vigilante in trying to make other
humans a part of their evil corrupt empire.
That begs the question, if they get kicked out would they ever leave?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The truth is their church is nearly wrecked and they do not want to be embarrassed or get their ass whooped by the Asian economic giants. In failure, they want to die rather than be reformed. The product of their existence has a lot to be desired and their intelligence keeps us paralyzed on a need based taxing system. Their industries are not cherished and their endless plight to break out of poverty is intolerable or has grown intolerable. We have seen this in the annals of American history. They squandered their freedoms and liberties. It is time decisive measures are implemented and their existence or reality in ours, be finished off. We know they will never end this or surrender, never. We know they will never reform, never. We can only be pulled deeper in this mess or get more entangled in their existence and church reality. It can only get worse until they commit suicide or be killed by the police. Who is going to call their bluff and loans, put an end to how they exploit the kindness of others by getting them to agree? Furthermore, they put more thought and effort into it than needed. Now they claim they do not know what is real or not and must investigate or delay this matter. Will they ever investigate whether a heaven exist, if they are going to heaven, or if they believe in hell only? They have to agree this must end with being reformed or die at the hands of the police; our police force also not their church. Your church is nothing more than a state of chaos and debt.
Why are we constantly trying to
stop their church and why are they always following us or trying to make us
agree? Furthermore, why can’t they stand
before the world and say what is the obvious?
There is no guarantee we will have to stop their church or these elusive
religious wars in the future and too many people have died or had to shed blood
for a dumbass and a poverty stricken fool, whose politics is based on
need. Their house is in total chaos and
they want us to feel their pain or agree with their miserable existence? How is their secrets and silence going to
benefit everybody or going to boost National Security? Now there is way too much to be desired about
their church including the financial chaos wrecking our nation; are we expected
to stop their church again or fear their inability to shut up, an ignoramus and
smartass in our life? Now we have to
stop their politics, church, and the poor from wrecking our nation and wreaking
havoc and insanity to our life? It is
time to unplug their American experience and expect more value for our future
and freedom. It took them this long to
figure out what is real and not real? If
your mouth and wretched misery is the bad guy, will a gun stop this bad
guy? Why? Guns always win wars and always stop a
psychopath, why not now? The police can’t
help you and they have not or could not help us, will the truth or justice stop
your church in history?
Obviously they have created a lot of problems for us and our life, a lot. Obviously, there is no end to this unless they commit suicide or be killed by the police. So why hasn't any of the above occurred? Why we are still stuck in this or their religious experiences? Is it their race? Is it their relationship with
Why do we need the Office of
Hurricane and Earthquakes to separate the good from the bad, the dead from the
living, and the greedy from the profitable?
Why do we have so many immigrants in America poor, needy, unhealthy, and
facing worse destruction or recourse from their church, which is totally flawed
and unabashed about their freedom or tolerance levels? Why do they all question reality and feel
detached or God-like? Is it because they
are counterfeit or a fake or is it they cannot tell what is real or not? Why do they face this reality or punishment
and is it our fault? It begins with the
company or government, and then it begins with their product or existence. They claim their reality is a need based one
and we must oblige, even if it is business.
They need to stop apologizing for this while they are doing it or in the
act of this religious existence. What
finally stopped the Unabomber or their church reality to question technology
and how they feel? Was it our inclusion
in it or their inclusion in ours refusing to be reformed? At least they can agree to the
blessings we receive by the Office of Hurricane-Earthquake, real or not. They cannot even agree on that and act just
as a traitor and terrorist would. At
least they can agree and reform, we cannot be liable for their crimes or
stupidity. If God is watching and God is
angry, then why are they victims or not agreeing? Are we powerless to the Unabomber or their feelings?
How did we get in this
predicament and why do we need the Office of Hurricane-Earthquakes to stop
their church experience from spilling over into our reality? They seek to make America
their home; America
is not seeking one from them. So why
does the government have to either kill them or rescue them while we are stuck
in their stupid reality? Is it because
they are only trying to help or so greedy they expect us to tolerate it? The bottom line is they need to shut this
church down similar to other religious groups who come to America due to
war or war with reality. We are not
going to be their ever lasting baby sitter or try to pepper their ass until
they stop or go away. I think it is
clear their existence and reality is a little problematic while they insist on
our first born child.
The problem is rooted in the
Manifesto of the Unabomber. They are
waging war on us and continue to insist they are only helping or want to
help. The problem is their church and
the state of chaos within their ranks or community. They want to die and are mentally dead;
grasping on their beliefs and lack of reality or government power. It is the government and the people in it who
are the problem or the rescue. The
rescue is the problem because they created the reality. There is no solution to their religious
problems or beliefs, only death or worse.
Before they chose communism or radicalism, now the options have dried up
or been terminated.
Unless the government and their
leaders are willing to be upfront or willing to admit to this product problem,
their reality and their existence will be identical to the Unabomber Manifesto. This does not get rid of them either; it only
acknowledges the problem exists. If
their leaders do not want to face reality or abide by the laws, to cease and
desist, then they must commit suicide.
It is imperative they understand this.
The crimes they face are so severe the courts cannot begin to imagine or
cope with their existence. However, they
continue in the most arrogant and selfish manners their political existence or
power; a state of bullying. This is
their church. A refusal to reform and a
wish to die only; it is their product we are trying to dispose or remove from
our life so the impact is happier.
Unless we can deport them or find
a place they can inhabit reformed and in a different state of mind, the cycle
and endless problems will cripple the real reality. The problem is over their dead bodies. The problem is they want to stay in America
unreformed when it is a bad product and clearly wrong. However, their reality is a need based one;
hence they seek the freedoms, luxuries, and existence they cannot have or are
prohibited from; a game of cat and mouse using temptations. Again, they seek things they cannot have or
impose this on us; do on to others as they have done to you.
Why are they getting people in
this predicament or in more trouble? We
cannot be liable for their actions or their failure in America . Their immigration to America has
been questionable. The continued
immigration to America
worsens this reality due to expectations and standards. However, the expansion of the poor and the
expansion of the population to invent or reinforce this reality, a state of
chaos or confusion to question their relationship with America or
capitalism continue on and on by their church and the breeding cycle of their
church. We know this due to their
birthrate and their religious affiliation centuries long.
To this day they question their
relation and the conditions they expect from reality. They get together and form this reality, then
look outwards or get others into this predicament. The solution is very simple. Can we send them back and demand a better
product? Most people are born with
innate management skills and clear knowledge of whom and what they are. Therefore, a big gap exists but their
ignorance and stubbornness keeps us in this cycle or predicament. The use of history, veteran status, flaws and
handicaps, and the relationship with reality keeps them down and continues this
predicament. Meanwhile, their group
thinking or labor union characteristics are dictatorial methods of oppression.
First off let me say I am fed up
with the intervention or the vehicle problems.
Then when I purchase a new vehicle, I am caught in a dilemma or face
such painful chaos; I get stuck or end up loosing my money. It happened more than once. The landlord pressures when I am comfortable
and then lack of pressure when I get my bills jacked is still ongoing. So they are going to pay for this and the
legal damages; then face jail or capital punishment. Their church refuses to be reformed and claim
they are not worried and their membership is growing or not the problem. They have a right to reproduce or exist.
The predicament when we are
facing such an evil or demented traitor is to send them home and exclude them
from any benefits America
has to offer. They seek a check and have
serious reservations which are part of their reformation or reforming
process. However, they choose to die
instead and are psychopathic about it.
They feel these errors or the stupidity of their existence is a cycle of
abuse we have to be part of or listen to, an inclusion or membership they are
eager to recruit for. We have literally
gone to war with them to stop this or stop them and it has not worked yet, what
does? Why do their men rely on hard
labor and why do their women rely on education or child rearing? Is it technology?
The question is how we got into
this predicament. Is it because they are
tough? Is it because they are waiting
for a check, to the Democrats or Republican Party? Is it because we are similar, in a similar
predicament, or have nothing in common with their church or want to be involved
with their business or hell? Is it because
they refuse to reform, reality fit for a poor slave or miserable wreck? Oh and Limbaugh had to point out the battle
with the psoriasis battle which has been part of this medical pressure. We can do without all of this, really.
Clearly, we are in this
predicament because the conditions of their politics and miserable existence in
America
are incapable of keeping up or embrace technology. Their work is identical to the Unabomber, who
clearly states they have not made up their mind or are fully convinced about
capitalism, technology, or how we got in this predicament. Their religion and existence refuses to
reform or become modern human beings.
This wave of immigration from 1860 to 1980 has put us into a very
difficult predicament, deliberately and intentionally because of their state of
mind.
The Unabomber does not detail the
problem with their men or their women. A
lot of their men question their sexuality.
A lot of their men refuse education or positive growth. A lot of their women embrace education and
are very educated. This blob of mess now
wanders into our world or wanders as a feeding animal looking for victims or
this team membership, yet they claim it is business or growth they are not
fully sold on or confident about. In
other words, they have not gotten their act together, stuck in this detached
reality or waiting for change. Members
of the Unabomber group are highly organized, seeking war, wandering around, and
trying to entangle us or prevent capture.
They are trying to capture us and we are trying to capture them;
pressure tactics and tests of confidence.
So why are they poor and why are
we stuck in this? How did we get in this
predicament and what is the state of mind of the Unabomber? We are dealing with the Unabomber and his followers,
whom he describes in debate or dialogue.
Their world is so flawed, so abusive, and so unbiased; they seek a new
identity and are not exactly sure who and what they are or what they want. They need to be reformed, educated, taught
manners, strive for perfection, and live according to the laws; they refuse all
of this. Instead they seek friendship,
inclusion, or argumentative methods of getting their way. Was this about them or us? We can do without any of this now and from
the start. However, they have changed
their ways and feel they are victims, fed up and on a war path. Only there to disrupt or spread this secret existence;
a real reliance on labor and treasures not intended for their existence or
reality.
They do not even know why they are
poor or stupid; what is real not real or what is true or false. They
cannot and refuse to live under the laws because it conflicts with their
beliefs and does nothing for their poverty or future. If it took their
church this long to figure out reality or the impact of technology and
education, then they are damned and have a major problem with their products.
If by this time they cannot surrender or face the punishments of the law,
then serious consequences must be considered for their existence in government
and the rescue. Until then we will be paralyzed and be stuck in this
conflicting reality or existence. Do
they realize it makes matters worse when they try to help or put a band aid on
this matter? Do they have the intellect
or sophistication to get each other out of this predicament, avoiding all out
war and conflict?
___________________________________________________________
THE CONDITION OR REALITY OF THEIR POLITICS REBORN IN
CYCLES: “[The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for
the human race. They have greatly
increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in "advanced"
countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have
subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological
suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted
severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology
will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater
indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably
lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead
to increased physical suffering even in "advanced" countries.] - 1.1 Introduction to the Unabomber Manifesto
–
THE INABILITY
TO KEEP UP OR EMBRACE TECHNOLOGY: [The
industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it
survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological
suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of
adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many
other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives,
the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying
the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and
autonomy.] - 1.1.2 Introduction to the
Unabomber Manifesto –
REFORM OR DELAY THE INEVITABLE: [If
the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the
bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will
be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.]
- 1.1.3 Introduction to the Unabomber Manifesto –
A SECRET WAR
AND REVOLUTION TO PRESERVE THEIR IDENTITY OR HISTORY: [We therefore advocate a revolution against
the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence: it
may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades.
We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the
measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to
prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to
be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but
the economic and technological basis of the present society.] - 1.1.4
Introduction to the Unabomber Manifesto –
WHAT IS THEIR
GOAL OR MOTIVE IN THIS: [In this article
we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out
of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only
briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other
developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our
discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in
which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed
environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about
environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we
consider these to be highly important.] - 1.1.5 Introduction to the Unabomber
Manifesto –
THE PSYCHOLOGY
OF THE DEMOCRATS AND CATHOLICS (SOUTHERN BAPTIST), HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS
PREDICAMENT? [Almost everyone will agree
that we live in a deeply troubled society. One of the most widespread
manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the
psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the
problems of modern society in general.
But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism
could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the movement is
fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we
speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists,
collectivists, "politically correct" types, feminists, gay and
disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone
who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying
to get at in discussing leftism is not so much a movement or an ideology as a
psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean
by "leftism" will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion
of leftist psychology. Even so, our
conception of leftism will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but
there doesn’t seem to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do is
indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that
we believe are the main driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim
to be telling the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is meant to apply to
modern leftism only. We leave open the question of the extent to which our
discussion could be applied to the leftists of the 19th and early 20th
century.] - 1.1.5 Introduction to the Unabomber Manifesto –
FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY: Section 1.3 of Introduction to the Unabomber
Manifesto
10. By "feelings of inferiority" we
mean not only inferiority feelings in the strictest sense but a whole spectrum
of related traits: low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive
tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists
tend to have such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these
feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.
11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost
anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we
conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is
pronounced among minority rights advocates, whether or not they belong to the
minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the
words used to designate minorities. The terms "negro,"
"oriental," "handicapped" or "chick" for an
African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory
connotation. "Broad" and "chick" were merely the feminine
equivalents of "guy," "dude" or "fellow." The
negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists
themselves. Some animal rights advocates have gone so far as to reject the word
"pet" and insist on its replacement by "animal
companion." Leftist anthropologists
go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could
conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the word
"primitive" by "nonliterate." They seem almost paranoid
about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our
own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We
merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)
12. Those who
are most sensitive about "politically incorrect" terminology are not
the average black ghetto-dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled
person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any
"oppressed" group but come from privileged strata of society.
Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have
secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are
heterosexual, white males from middle-class families.
13. Many
leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have
an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent
(homosexuals), or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these
groups are inferior. They would never admit it to themselves that they have
such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior
that they identify with their problems. (We do not suggest that women, Indians,
etc., ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology).
14. Feminists
are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong as capable as
men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear
that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.
15. Leftists
tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and
successful. They hate America America America
16. Words like
"self-confidence," "self-reliance," "initiative",
"enterprise," "optimism," etc. play little role in the
liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic,
pro-collectivist. He wants society to
solve everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of
person who has an inner sense of confidence in his own ability to solve his own
problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept
of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.
17. Art forms
that appeal to modern leftist intellectuals tend to focus on sordidness, defeat
and despair, or else they take an orgiastic tone, throwing off rational control
as if there were no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation
and all that was left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment.
18. Modern
leftist philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to
insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask
serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how,
if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious
that modern leftist philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians
systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved
emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts
because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an
outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies
the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and
rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful,
superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e. failed, inferior). The leftist’s
feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification
of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or
inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental
illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic
explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to
make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to
give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it.
Thus if a person is "inferior" it is not his fault, but society’s,
because he has not been brought up properly.
19. The leftist
is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of inferiority make him a
braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, a ruthless competitor. This
kind of person has not wholly lost faith in himself. He has a deficit in his
sense of power and self-worth, but he can still conceive of himself as having
the capacity to be strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce his
unpleasant behavior. [1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings
of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as
individually strong and valuable. Hence
the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large
organization or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.
20. Notice the
masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protest by lying down in
front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police or racists to abuse them,
etc. These tactics may often be effective, but many leftists use them not as a
means to an end but because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a
leftist trait.
21. Leftists
may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principle,
and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized
type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist
activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the
drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated
to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to
help. For example, if one believes that
affirmative action is good for black people, does it make sense to demand
affirmative action in hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more
productive to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at
least verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that
affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not
take such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal.
Instead, race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own
hostility and frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black
people, because the activists’ hostile attitude toward the white majority tends
to intensify race hatred.
22. If our
society had no social problems at all, the leftists would have to INVENT
problems in order to provide themselves with an excuse for making a fuss.
23. We
emphasize that the foregoing does not pretend to be an accurate description of
everyone who might be considered a leftist. It is only a rough indication of a
general tendency of leftism.
No comments:
Post a Comment