Wednesday, 15 April, 2009 These videos of Ann sound like my own biography or my life. In first grade, 1977-78, I had my first girlfriend named Tori M. Her parents took her out of public school and sent her to private school and I met her later in high school. At age 14, my twin buddies and best friends from upstate New York began to hold our own parties every Friday. At age 16 we all went to our first concert (Anthrax and some punk band) at "legendary" Hammerjacks in Baltimore, MD. Hammerjacks was closed down and is near the railroad tracks and station. Unless I hear it from Ann, I cannot tell if she is talking about me or her; she has my entire biography. I know Ann is very remorseful because she has been in so many "tic for tat" and fierce fights, but tried to explain how she did not intentionally try to anger or piss me off. I have never ever known her to act that way or betray my trust, never. I cannot see her with someone for 20 years and doing something stupid or trashing 20 years and more of a relation. To me it is completely alien and some odd aberration. Ann did not have many "boyfriends" and love interests.
New Video on Ramones:
Annie did NOT buy the home, it was too expensive, but look at her face! Cute:
This apartment is the high end "urban mansions" in Brooklyn and Manhattan. Art dealers and art alficionatos usually have these types of houses in New York. I used to talk to Ann about how cool residences are downtown where you drive in the door and straight into your living room. This apartment was too expensive. I have no idea why she posted this or why "John" is interviewing her in someone's home. It is a cute video but we used to talk about how cool these types of residences are and who lives in them. I do not know about this stuff, only how Ann wanted to sit down and explain the last seven years after 2002. Also, if you have seen Bill Maher when he says how Strom Thurmond had an affair with his servant in South Carolina, then you understand the gist of what is being done to Annie. It is better to isolate herself and not pal around with these people but she says it was only for her career and now she is allowed more freedom to choose who she is friends with. I can see it and how things changed or how she is more free.
Kelly's Court: Rape on the Subway and "No duty to rescue."
The video on Fox News, Meaghan Kelly's Court, where the girl was raped in the subway and sued the NY Transit Authority and lost because the judge said "no duty to resuce." That case is wrong and adjudicated in gross error. The public has a "reasonable expectation" about their security. The question is a gap between no duty and total duty. Had a bomb been placed on the subway, no duty is not valid. In this case, it is a rapist openly raping a female who is yelling for help. Immediately the behavior appears "cruel" and "prolonging." So a girl is being harassed, she leaves the subway, is subdued and raped while two employees of the NYC Transit Authority watch but hit the panic button. Are they trained in security or can replace security guards? If so, why was a whistle not used or a flash light? Why was a camera not pulled out? They are not armed guards but they are given a panic button so they must be trained as a certified security guard for insurance reasons.
These matters come up all the time in high priced office complexes. In cases where office buildings hire security guards as escorts, the walk to their cars in parking garages are an insurance liability. It is cheaper to hire a security company or to show some effort to patrol the grounds. Like a bomb threat, people have a reasonable expectation to be rescued by the Transit Authority. No effort is no excuse for arguing all efforts. Therefore, New York's "no duty to rescue is corruption and advocates criminal activity with no liability." This is private property and they police the grounds. This was improper and total lack of security and worse, during a violent and dangerous act.
No comments:
Post a Comment