ALEX WRITES ALSO TO POLITCO.COM TO REPORT PROBLEMS AND WHO WAS BEHIND IT OR DOING WHAT (OPENLY LYING, CHEATING, BULLYING, HARASSING, BLOCKING, AND CHE

ALEX AND ANN WAR ON POLITICO.COM (CANNOT TELL WHO IS HITTING OR IF RUSH LIMBAUGH IS BEHIND IT – DO A SEARCH ON POLITICO.COM ON RUSH’S WEB SITE OR WHO HOW DEACTIVATIONS IS BEHIND 32 ACCOUT). AGAIN, RUSH LIES AND LIED ABOUT STALKING ANN AND ALEX… OR WERE THE LIBERALS JUST RIDDING HIS COAT TAILS AND DOING HIS DIRTY WORK? HERE ARE THE EXACHAGES BETWEEN ANN AND ALEX AND POLITICO.COM AND THE PEOPLE DOING THE STALKING AND DIRTY WORK. (NOTE: ANN IS NO LONGER ON THAT SITE AND KNOWS WHAT THE PROBLEM IS AND WHO IS UNLEASHING WHITE SUPREMIST GROUPS TO CATER SYMPATHY FOR OBAMA? RUSH AND HIS LITTLE WEAKLING NETWORK WHO DO HIS DIRTY WORK)

Rush; are you a gateway to liberalism, corruption, communism, secret white supremacy, and a world of hate filled problems of this world? A yes or no will be fine! No need to defend the Pope behind enemy lines. This monolith used the race card to humiliate me and the race card to produce a high priestess and they did not even know they were dealing with psychos and commandoes and how they were trespassing on our mission. So now, you do not want to get out of our mission and want to stay behind enemy lines? What now? Either you play a mission card or try to grab ours; can you take ours or did you already fail so many times already?

Why do you feel Ann does the dirty work for me or why do you refuse to believe I do the dirty work for her? Why? How did you come up with that doozy after so many people are trying to figure out what is going on? This is not about us, it is about them, and do you get it? Who is them and who does their dirty work?


#81
Aug. 19, 2008 - 4:37 PM EST updated
My, my, my, what a grumpy little man you are! Please, take the bet that I am one of the hopeless PUM(Fat)A whiners – and I must commend your clever injection of the word "Fat" in the acronym, however, am surprised you didn’t choose something a little more daring like P(C)U(NT)MA.
You know nothing about me, or what I believe, or who I support, or whether or not I am capable of joking, or whether I am married or gay or even like beer – but I do know that your screen name makes me believe you are anything but a "Chris111,” but most definitely a “Dick000.”



#105
Aug. 21, 2008 - 1:04 PM EST

I wrote John F. Harris Editor-in-Chief, Ryan P. Mannion, Managing Editor, Website Technology and more than 50 emails to Website Feedback asking that a feature be added to enable members to ‘block’ PMs from specified other members – and received NO response.

A perverted member of Politico has been sending this user ID – literally – HUNDREDS of PMs – the ones I opened accidentally were quite insane – rantings about the WTC, terrorism, his inability to hold a job, how the FBI is 'after him' – some, 20 pages in length – pockmarked w/ vulgarities, obscenities and photos of certain parts of his anatomy and more recently, threats of violence and vows of revenge. Following me from thread to thread, he would post personal messages of a disturbing sexual nature – and when I did not respond, his posting became even more vile and obscene.

Politico, impotent in their willingness or ability to do anything, did nothing and advised me to set my profile to 'private.'

Anyhoo, that did nothing - you can still receive PMs even if your profile is on 'private,' so I decided the best thing is to no longer use this ID.

He’s all yours, Politico!

REPLY:

8/21/2008 3:29:52 PM

Dear xxx;

Just so you know, we used to have a great time cracking on people and I know you would laugh so hard trading emails with me also. Someone must have hacked into my account because I did not send any of those things and I never did anything such. Instead, someone kept "deactivating" my account and blaming me for something that the politico.com staff was doing. Using my account to send you mean emails while we were getting 2000 hits on each of your postings. You can clearly see I have stopped emailing you and I DO HAVE YOUR NEW EMAIL. I only send mail there WHEN YOU SEND ME MAIL WITH YOUR REPLY TO PROVE IT WAS ME.

None of my postings have ever discussed ANY of those topics and it HAS TO BE SOMEONE ON POLITICO trying to get you to send naked pictures. I have never sent any naked pictures, never. Who is trying to ask you about sex, it is not me? I DO NOT ASK OR HAVE EVER ASKED YOU ABOUT YOUR PRIVATE LIFE! NEVER. I have never asked or sent any pictures, asked for any, suggest any intercourse and way to... If I want to I will just call you or come over. So it seems as though one of or the politico.com staffs wishes to get some action but I and using me to accomplish that.

Thanks politico.com for clearing that up and making SSC hate me now... i am not doing it or did and THEY KNEW THIS, SSC ALSO KNEW THIS AND I HAVE HER NEW EMAIL. Their staff was flat out jealous and since I have avoided and avoided talking to you, anybody, or even posting. I did not and never did any of this and I swear someone was breaking into my account even if I marked it “private.” I had 100 views when I made it private and it was WORSE!

I stopped talking you altogether and actually got a new friend on another site and hardly come here anymore because of what happened to you and me. I DO NOT KNOW IF THIS IS ABOUT YOU OR ME BUT WE USED TO GET OVER 2000 HITS ON OUR QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSIONS AND 100’S OF DELETED POSTINGS. I NEVER DID ANY OF THIS; IT IS AND WAS A CONSPIRACY ON POLITICO’S STAFF AND USING MY NAME.

But they had evidence or said they did!



I would set my account to private because of so many problems and SSC getting so mad. Then I would get 30 “views” a day which caused me to wonder who or why anyone was “viewing” my account, yet nothing suggested anybody was emailing or doing what she described. All I know was none of my posts related to it and I did not and never asked her for any details of her love life.

She sent me bizarre emails which I kept on asking about but never got the chance about emailing luckyirishgoddess or a few of those names and I was wondering why I would email them; I never spoke to them or wanted to. Was she saying they wanted to talk to me or was she saying they were emailing her about me? I dunno… my head only EXPLODED… but SSC and I used to get over 2000 hits on our posts and so many replies I spent hours a day on here. Then I left and stopped and like some inner city, they began to brag about how tough and how responsive they were!

Sorry, me no ghetto, me no love you long time either!





8/21/2008 4:08:48 PM

COMMENTS AND WHY THEY DELETE POSTINGS (UNAPPROVED)

As you can see and as I have stated before, the ideal VP of Obama would be a lawyer and with a less background influence than Hillary. Such the case with Edwards and he is proving why he himself needs a good lawyer because soon he will need to explain about using campaign finance money to refurbish his out of wedlock affair and neo-natal neo conservatism.

Many conservatives like to suggest that voting on a party line is necessary good for the party but it can have a negative impact in the long term and cause a string of upsets in the legislative branch or even the judicial branch. I do not think voting on a party line is good and should be closely examined as “what is good for the nation.” It’s good to weather a storm than sink the ship. In this case, Obama is painful and so is McCain; but we can stop McCain, we cannot stop Obama. That stands as uncontested even if those who vote party line are too stupid or ignorant to notice what they are doing to their friends and associates while they pledge their loyalty. These two candidates are very similar and they are both honest and sincere as you can tell. Neither will lie to the public if they are elected (ahem ahem, sniff).

I am not the only here who disagrees with this analysis and even SSC can see the wisdom in this very difficult question and answer session. Neither candidate is ideal for the nation but one can be stopped while the other is terrifying to say the least. This is no gateway to heaven you know; let’s not act like it is and be more honest than the competitors.

1. What is rich? Rishe is admitting you are (like owning an expensive car, you are rishe)
2. Can we define marriage? Yes it is a traditional union between an man and a woman meant to join them for the purpose of one existence and procreating. Is same sex marriage this one existence? It is only for financial reasons and cannot be lumped sum as “traditional” understandings of what marriage is about. However, there can be provisions which can allow for same sex unions to be one existence for only financial reasons. What other reasons are there? Adopt a child? The death tax? Taxes? Why do you have to ruin marriage if this is only for financial reasons?
3. Obama was wrong on marriage. Legal marriages can fail while true unions can never wither. The financial part is different and mostly paperwork. Same sex unions are on that line but like animals and fishes in nature, they are born with mothering and fathering skills. How many gay animals do you know who have mothering instincts or go through the motions with an insect or mammal with the same sex?


Although poverty and human conditions in Kenya or for that matter all of Africa are at times near famine or babies dying like wildebeests in barren plains without something as simple as clean water, you have to ask if there are any efforts to improve the conditions there. It seems like every time I turn on my TV, I hear about genocide and when a story from Afranca comes in, it is about human tragedy or suffering.

Maybe Obama does have a sense of purpose in life where humanitarian aid, medicine, and a desire to lessen the suffering in this world so that the number of babies born with AIDS or who die not having enough to eat at night can be addressed. If Obama was insolvent to the idea that suffering exists in this world, then he knows in the bottom of his heart, how it feels to grow up poor, oppressed, and even going to bed at night hungry or malnourished.

That is not the problem here. The problem here is this is his blood brother and you cannot overlook the blood bond and his desire to help or help fix the conditions which plague not only Kenya (a very rich safari and wilderness)but just about the entirety of Africa. . There is no amount of money in this world and no amount of aid on this planet which is enough to fix this problem or his long lost brother and that is the saddest part.

Until or unless Obama can get in there and truly tell his brother or his people why they need to consider their own future and to produce the conditions which allow the sick and the unwanted from proper development or even prosperity, there is no leader in this world, no rich fortune or amount of money, and no amount of suffering which will ever be able to understand why little babies starve in their own mothers arms and what it feels like to go to bed hungry or starving to death.

It is a sad story and Obama does or may have a good intention; but ask what good is that and how much worse he can make it. Can he make it or do they need to make their own future; that is the mystery of life and the proof of pudding which human existence has professed to for centuries on end.

How many people in this world can watch as a child starves to death or goes to bed hungry? Now how many people can watch this story about his brother and the personal triumph or tale that if Obama could or had the power to do so, he would and he would give them a better life and one which they might deserve?

You cannot declare someone at war yet until they are your enemy and so far, we are not at war. Just imagine your long lost brother doing his thing and inspired or a child going to bed hungry and not knowing why or left with this memory 20 years later. Why is that sad?

8/22/2008 8:55:46 AM

This site (politico.com) is like a dungeon. I do not know if you have ever lived with a total loser or someone who gives you all the attention when you want none from them and wish them dead. I will speak for XXX because I know she is not a loser amd does not like a life with losers. This site is old, decrepit, and reeks of dead flesh and a lonely measly life to be so intrusive in the life of people who are not.

Unless or until you have lived a life that has a total loser so intrusive and so annoyingly giving you attention, you really do not and cannot say. Mostly, they are losers in general and some are just old and stupid. I am sure they lived a long life and now their geriatric motives are almost identical to some loser you make fun of and want to inflict pain on.

When you are a winner, you surround yourself with winners. When you are a loser, then you have a big following. I know and we all know who is the winner and who is the loser because the loser is the quiet and the one who hates others talking about what their problem is.

This site is not a winner. However, the people who actually are here like SS&C and I are winners but they feel that being a loser is a way of life and we all know what this feels like NOW! Life with a loser is miserable…

The scary part is it is a way of life to these people and no money in the world will ever compensate for their stupid SOB story. They do not deserve to live. Have you ever worked with a total loser and does it not make you want to kill them for BEING A TOTAL LOSER who feels superior or powerful?

8/21/2008 4:13:10 PM

THE POSTING WHICH GOT ME BANNED AND RESTRICTD FROM MORE POSING IF YOU MISSED IT: ON THE 12TH AMENDMENT…


Slavery by and large has been the worst thing ever to happen to America. It produced extreme hate, a gatewar to communism, rampant crime, buck tooth elitism, ghettos, catholic nonsense, bad music, bad porn, and most of all bad people.

I would make fun of McCain all day if I knew it would make the race problem go away and make them realize they are the problem also. Slavery brought us hate, centuries of crimes, some gateway to communism, really BAD porn, bad music, and of course the LAST RACIST PRESIDENT, OBAMA.

This is why I HAD A PROBLEM with conservatives… (Rove, Limbaugh, and a few others) who told me to back off or get lost. Now I defected and am an official communist revolutionary now! Long live Che, Chavez, Mao, Hoe, Deng, Lenin, Ski, Stolen, and Mugabe (and Obama).

McCain is willing to cut taxes more competitively than Obama but he is not willing to denounce Obama on his tax policies or his prerequisite that government define how many houses Obama can own over the course of his entire life. That is your problem with McCain; he is willing to cut taxes 10% when Obama needs 10% more.

Until or unless Obama can get in there and truly tell his brother or his people why they need to consider their own future and to produce the conditions which allow the sick and the unwanted from proper development or even prosperity, there is no leader in this world, no rich fortune or amount of money, and no amount of suffering which will ever be able to understand why little babies starve in their own mothers arms and what it feels like to go to bed hungry or starving to death.

8/21/2008 3:29:52 PM

Dear SSC;

Just so you know, we used to have a great time cracking on people and I know you would laugh so hard trading emails with me also. Someone must have hacked into my account because I did not send any of those things and I never did anything such. Instead, someone kept "deactivating" my account and blaming me for something that the politico.com staff was doing. Using my account to send you mean emails while we were getting 2000 hits on each of your postings. You can clearly see I have stopped emailing you and I DO HAVE YOUR NEW EMAIL. I only send mail there WHEN YOU SEND ME MAIL WITH YOUR REPLY TO PROVE IT WAS ME.

None of my postings have ever discussed ANY of those topics and it HAS TO BE SOMEONE ON POLITICO trying to get you to send naked pictures. I have never sent any naked pictures, never. Who is trying to ask you about sex, it is not me? I DO NOT ASK OR HAVE EVER ASKED YOU ABOUT YOUR PRIVATE LIFE! NEVER. I have never asked or sent any pictures, asked for any, suggest any intercourse and way to... If I want to I will just call you or come over. So it seems as though one of or the politico.com staffs wishes to get some action but I and using me to accomplish that.

Thanks politico.com for clearing that up and making SSC hate me now... i am not doing it or did and THEY KNEW THIS, SSC ALSO KNEW THIS AND I HAVE HER NEW EMAIL. Their staff was flat out jealous and since I have avoided and avoided talking to you, anybody, or even posting. I did not and never did any of this and I swear someone was breaking into my account even if I marked it “private.” I had 100 views when I made it private and it was WORSE!

I stopped talking you altogether and actually got a new friend on another site and hardly come here anymore because of what happened to you and me. I DO NOT KNOW IF THIS IS ABOUT YOU OR ME BUT WE USED TO GET OVER 2000 HITS ON OUR QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSIONS AND 100’S OF DELETED POSTINGS. I NEVER DID ANY OF THIS; IT IS AND WAS A CONSPIRACY ON POLITICO’S STAFF AND USING MY NAME.

But they had evidence or said they did!

Not_Meant_2B

8/21/2008 99:49:99 PM

I would set my account to private because of so many problems and SSC getting so mad. Then I would get 30 “views” a day which caused me to wonder who or why anyone was “viewing” my account, yet nothing suggested anybody was emailing or doing what she described. All I know was none of my posts related to it and I did not and never asked her for any details of her love life.

She sent me bizarre emails which I kept on asking about but never got the chance about emailing luckyirishgoddess or a few of those names and I was wondering why I would email them; I never spoke to them or wanted to. Was she saying they wanted to talk to me or was she saying they were emailing her about me? I dunno… my head only EXPLODED… but SSC and I used to get over 2000 hits on our posts and so many replies I spent hours a day on here. Then I left and stopped and like some inner city, they began to brag about how tough and how responsive they were!

Sorry, me no ghetto, me no love you long time either!


So Ann, did they love you or was it just… (Ah, so they know now that you were not flirting and were taken all this time! That makes me so jealous!) In no way am I disappointed and in no way will I loose faith or confidence unless you give me a reason to. Raging political wildfires on Kausfiles.com and Politico.com (go to politico.com and win back that hill from the sappers!) I think they are only stalkers and wanted to outsmart you but could not and have not given up or thrown in the towel.

Call in the troops! Hold on and hold on tight my love… and understand you are in the mist of psychopaths who are tracing your cell phone (tower ID lock or smart chip – will write up the CDMA or GSM tower couplers to capacity), credit card, email, and IP address. What was that old phrase in politics, “don’t whisper too loudly or else we might hear you.” Trust me, they were doing all of this to me also okay and had so many investigations to encourage “a rescue” or a “love connection” scandal. The DA and the police were on me about your love connection and they knew a long time ago. Life behind enemy lines and mistreated like a POW. Coming to rescue you okay my lovely… and there is no disappointment, you are a perfect 10 and above, no joke and hands down!

Cyber_Warfare_HQ



DID THIS BACKFIRE ON THE OBAMA CAMP (TEARING HIM UP) AND HOW QUICK WAS IT EXTINGUISHED? DEBATE WAS ON POLITICO.COM (TORN UP)



Tuesday, August 26, 2008
BREITBART: 'The Inconvenient Obama'
Andrew Breitbart

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Sen. Barack Obama has a problem. And it lives in a hut.

His name is George Hussein Onyango Obama, and he is the 26-year-old half brother of Mr. Obama, the multimillionaire autobiographer who neglected to write that his paternal sibling lives on less than a dollar a month in the outer slums of Nairobi, Kenya.

They have met twice.

Unearthed by Italian Vanity Fair and virtually ignored by the American press, the inconvenient George Obama could emerge as a compelling character in the freshman senator's carefully edited road-to-the-White-House narrative - especially now that his campaign has unleashed a personal attack on Sen. John McCain's station in life.

The Obama hit job on Mr. McCain seizes on his clumsiness in answering a reporter's question about how many houses he and his wife, Cindy, own. "I think - I'll have my staff get to you," Mr. McCain fumbled. In a well-funded nationally televised ad spot titled "Seven," Mr. Obama's messenger twice repeats the correct answer as the words on the screen reinforce the meme of class warfare.

"Seven. Worth $13 million."

The Sunday morning shows parroted Mr. Obama's shocking discovery that the McCain family is well-off. Smarting Obamaniacs campaigning for their messiah are now scripted to ask voters in battleground states how many houses they own and participate in an official campaign contest, "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire: McCain Edition." Winners receive hope, change and fist bumps - spoils of the "new kind of politics."

Someone who made $4.2 million last year and lives in a mansion that a mobster helped pay for should not be throwing stones. When Mr. Obama's flesh-and-blood lives in squalor, raising the standard of living of his opponent's extended family is probably not a smart idea.

(Google for full article above or visit Ann Coulter web site…)