DEAR CONRAD BLACK; HIGH VOCABULARY BUT NOT MUCH SENSE OF THIS WORLD OR OTHERS; OUGHT TO SEE MY NEIGHBOURS; LAWSUIT; COMPLAINTS; APR 3, 2010

You are missing the point badly. The bottom line is Canada can be a very safe and good escape from the problems that do not fit well in Canada. Such the case with Palm Beach; a community that is by capita, the most guarded and policed. If the police are called, the drawbridges are pulled up. Even the mafia have attacked it with the most professional burglars. All we or she has proven is Palm Beach is the most protected and guarded secrets; now you will see for yourself a new security level; the most guarded and protected in the US military personnel line up. Do you understand and have it down pat now? However, the vocabulary and display of wine knowledge is extra ordinary for this line of work. Ann has not stopped or made any comment to me either; but she wants me to live closer to her. We are taking this case to trial and finishing up; they must escape it; not us. If they fail again, they will be foreclosed, evicted, and arrested by the FBI and defense forces; understand now? The cards are being thrown on the table; do you have any left or wish to surrender peacefully? Then do so in the civil lawsuit for 520 million. The ultimate point is you are not allowed to attack people on their property; that is all. If you do, they will seek safety and bring you to trial on their schedule; not yours and you will be forced to confess or look humiliated. You can claim to know the law, important people, live closely, are friends of VIPs, are well educated, and any "creditable" witness testimony gainfully employed. I or Ann will employ arguments you cannot defeat or use as our own defense and prosecution; to counter-suit the legal attack.

Conrad Black: http://network.nationalpost.com/NP/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2010/04/03/conrad-black-the-harridan-tis-us.aspx

This clearly proves you are very educated and knowledgeable: "Where it becomes more complicated is when she indulges her pleasure in affronting the sensibilities of the politically correct and decides to épater les bourgeois. This is bound to be bothersome to many Canadians, clinging as they do to a rather prim version of the country and its virtues."

The following comment is unrealistic but very high level thought: "Let us take The Globe and Mail’s Margaret Wente, who rather graciously acknowledged that Ann fires off her witticisms “with a wink,” but then re-entered the seamless mystical body of Canadian politically correct piety by calling her subject “a loud-mouthed, trash-talking aging babe,” a “fading harridan,” a “stringy agitator,” and a 'fading star from the Conservative Entertainment Network.' In reality, Ann Coulter is a well-educated (Cornell and Northwestern) lawyer and former clerk to an appellate court judge — a very courteous and civilized, well-read person who loves her family and is devoted to many old friends; is a practising main-line Christian, leads a discreet and dignified heterosexual life and has been a howling success in a very competitive field as a public-affairs commentator. She is always a television draw and has sold millions of books. She is never loud, never lewd, is only aging in the sense that all people are. Ms. Wente’s recourse to physical disparagements is disappointing, inaccurate in this case, and does not come from a natural source of such reflections. Ms. Coulter is neither fading, nor in the slightest a harridan, and speaks in an elegant, unaffected, patrician northeastern accent a little like Eleanor Roosevelt’s. She is slender, but is an attractive woman in a striking way. She uses speeches and television appearances to boost sales of her slightly outrageous pot-boiler books of political opinions. She often displays a fair bit of thigh, quite becomingly, and her book-cover photographs sometimes portray her as a slightly stern but wry school teacher. It is clever packaging, in other words."